<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ian International, Inc.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ianinternational.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ianinternational.com</link>
	<description>Complete Global &#38; Domestic Freight Transportation Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 19:28:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Re-Post with Additions: Guidance on the US &#8211; Colombia FTA</title>
		<link>http://www.ianinternational.com/566</link>
		<comments>http://www.ianinternational.com/566#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 19:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Howie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News & Regulatory Updates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ianinternational.com/?p=566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On April 30, 2012, CBP issued a memorandum that outlines the requirements for duty-free treatment under the new US-Columbia Free Trade Agreement.  The following must be marked on the entry in order to qualify for such treatment: 1. The country of origin must be as &#8220;CO&#8221; 2. The country of export must be &#8220;CO&#8221; 3.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On April 30, 2012, CBP issued a memorandum that outlines the requirements for duty-free treatment under the new US-Columbia Free Trade Agreement.  The following must be marked on the entry in order to qualify for such treatment:</p>
<p>1. The country of origin must be as &#8220;CO&#8221;</p>
<p>2. The country of export must be &#8220;CO&#8221;</p>
<p>3. The FTA claim must contain a tariff number with the special &#8220;CO&#8221; program indicator</p>
<p>4. HTSUS classifications 9822.08.01 &#8211; 9822.08.35 and 9918.02.01 &#8211; 9918.24.20 are subject to quotas</p>
<p>5. In order to be exempted from MPF, goods that qualify as originating and have already been classified under a duty free tariff must transmit the country code SPI CO.</p>
<p>6. Cotton or manmade sewing thread must be both formed and finished in either the US or Colombia.  The only exception to this is for manmande fiber staple sewing thread.</p>
<p>7. Knit or woven narrow elastics or &#8220;strips&#8221; must also be formed and finished in either the US or Colombia.  This is a change from the Andean Trade Promotion and Drug Eradication Act which allowed &#8220;strips&#8221; to be sourced anywhere as long as they stayed within the 25% value allowance.</p>
<p>8. Yarns and fabrics are subject to a maximum of 10 non originating de minimis provision, except for spandex.  Gimped yarns classified under HTS 5606 do not have to be originating materials.</p>
<p>9. The need to determine if a component is a trimming or a fabric is no longer necessary.  Only the component of garment that meets the tariff shift requirement will determine the classification.  Specific visible linings, narrow elastics, sewing thread and pocketing fabrics will still need to be assessed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ianinternational.com/566/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US &#8211; Colombia FTA Goes Into Effect</title>
		<link>http://www.ianinternational.com/us-colombia-fta-goes-into-effect</link>
		<comments>http://www.ianinternational.com/us-colombia-fta-goes-into-effect#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 19:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Howie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News & Regulatory Updates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ianinternational.com/?p=562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US &#8211; Colombia Free Trade Agreement enters into effect today, May 15, 2012.  As of today, over 80% of products exported to Colombia will be duty free.  The remaining tariff on goods will be phased out over the next 10 years. CBP has not yet issued the official message that their system has been]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US &#8211; Colombia Free Trade Agreement enters into effect today, May 15, 2012.  As of today, over 80% of products exported to Colombia will be duty free.  The remaining tariff on goods will be phased out over the next 10 years.</p>
<p>CBP has not yet issued the official message that their system has been updated to accommodate the necessary changes to process claims for preferential treatment.  Importers and exports should wait until CBP released the official announcement to file claims under the FTA.</p>
<p>Additionally, as of today, Colombia is no longer eligible for preferential treatment under the Generalized System of Preferences or the Andean Trade Preference Act.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ianinternational.com/us-colombia-fta-goes-into-effect/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advancement on WTO Case Challenging India&#8217;s Import Restrictions</title>
		<link>http://www.ianinternational.com/advancement-on-wto-case-challenging-indias-import-restrictions</link>
		<comments>http://www.ianinternational.com/advancement-on-wto-case-challenging-indias-import-restrictions#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 19:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Howie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News & Regulatory Updates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ianinternational.com/?p=563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ron Kirk, the United States Trade Representative, has issued an announcement that the US has asked the WTO to enact a dispute settlement panel tasked with the review of restrictions on US agricultural products.  This announcement comes on the heels of negotiations between the US and India held on April 16017 with no resolution. Mr.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron Kirk, the United States Trade Representative, has issued an announcement that the US has asked the WTO to enact a dispute settlement panel tasked with the review of restrictions on US agricultural products.  This announcement comes on the heels of negotiations between the US and India held on April 16017 with no resolution.</p>
<p>Mr. Kirk has stated that India has had a formal ban on certain US agricultural products since February 2007.  Supposedly, India enacted the ban to prevent outbreaks of avian flu even though the US has not had an outbreak of a highly pathogenic strain of avian flu since 2004.  Additionally, Mr. Kirk the international standards for control of avian flu do not justify imposing import bans.</p>
<p>US trade groups have estimated that if the ban were lifted, the value of poultry exports alone would be in excess of $300 million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ianinternational.com/advancement-on-wto-case-challenging-indias-import-restrictions/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Constitutional Review of March 13, 2012 Amendment to Tariff Act of 1930</title>
		<link>http://www.ianinternational.com/constitutional-review-of-march-13-2012-amendment-to-tariff-act-of-1930</link>
		<comments>http://www.ianinternational.com/constitutional-review-of-march-13-2012-amendment-to-tariff-act-of-1930#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 19:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Howie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News & Regulatory Updates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ianinternational.com/?p=557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On December 19, The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued their opinion in GPX International Tire, et al. v. US, et al., 666 F.3d 732, 741 (Fed. Cir. 2011) reh&#8217;g granted, 2011-1107, 2012 WL 1606223 (Fed. Cir. May 9, 2012).  This opinion came down ruling that it was not the intention of Congress to]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On December 19, The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued their opinion in <em>GPX International Tire, et al. v. US, et al., </em>666 F.3d 732, 741 (Fed. Cir. 2011) <em>reh&#8217;g granted<span style="text-decoration: underline;">,</span></em> 2011-1107, 2012 WL 1606223 (Fed. Cir. May 9, 2012).  This opinion came down ruling that it was not the intention of Congress to allow the Department of Commerce  to impose countervailing duty on goods from Non-Market Economy countries.</p>
<p>Following this decision, Congress reacted and on March 13, 2012 passed an Amendment to the Tariff Act of 1930 to specifically allow the imposition of such duties.  Text of the Senate bill can be found <span style="color: #0000ff;"><a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/D?d112:39:./temp/~bdDYXj:@@@L&amp;summ2=m&amp;|/home/LegislativeData.php?n=BSS;c=112|" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff;">here</span></a></span>.  At the same time, the appellees in the <em>GPX Int&#8217;l Tire</em> case had a pending petition for rehearing of the original appeal.</p>
<p>On May 9, 2012, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted the petition for rehearing and issued an order for the US Court of International Trade to examine the constitutionality of the new amendment.</p>
<p>Text of the Appeals Court order can be found <span style="color: #0000ff;"><a href="http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/images/stories/opinions-orders/11-1107.pdf" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff;">here</span></a></span>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ianinternational.com/constitutional-review-of-march-13-2012-amendment-to-tariff-act-of-1930/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guidance For Duty-Free Treatment under US-Columbia FTA</title>
		<link>http://www.ianinternational.com/guidance-for-duty-free-treatment-under-us-columbia-fta</link>
		<comments>http://www.ianinternational.com/guidance-for-duty-free-treatment-under-us-columbia-fta#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 21:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Howie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News & Regulatory Updates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ianinternational.com/?p=539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On April 30, 2012, CBP issued a memorandum that outlines the requirements for duty-free treatment under the new US-Columbia Free Trade Agreement.  The following must be marked on the entry in order to qualify for such treatment: 1. The country of origin must be as &#8220;CO&#8221; 2. The country of export must be &#8220;CO&#8221; 3.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On April 30, 2012, CBP issued a memorandum that outlines the requirements for duty-free treatment under the new US-Columbia Free Trade Agreement.  The following must be marked on the entry in order to qualify for such treatment:</p>
<p>1. The country of origin must be as &#8220;CO&#8221;</p>
<p>2. The country of export must be &#8220;CO&#8221;</p>
<p>3. The FTA claim must contain a tariff number with the special &#8220;CO&#8221;   program indicator</p>
<p>4. HTSUS classifications 9822.08.01 &#8211; 9822.08.35 and 9918.02.01 &#8211; 9918.24.20 are subject to quotas</p>
<p>5. In order to be exempted from MPF, goods that qualify as originating and have already been classified under a duty free tariff must transmit the country code SPI CO.</p>
<p>CBP does wish to reiterate that the US-Columbia FTA does not go into effect until May 15, 2012.  Additionally, as of May 15, Columbia will no longer be eligable for duty free treatment under either the Generalized System of Preferences (SPI A) or the Andean Trade Preference Act (SPI J and J+).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ianinternational.com/guidance-for-duty-free-treatment-under-us-columbia-fta/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Potential End to Chilean Import Duties</title>
		<link>http://www.ianinternational.com/potential-end-to-chilean-import-duties</link>
		<comments>http://www.ianinternational.com/potential-end-to-chilean-import-duties#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 20:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Howie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News & Regulatory Updates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ianinternational.com/?p=536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last Thursday, April 26, 2012, Chilean President Sebastian Pinera announced details of his tax overhaul package.  One aspect of note is the elimination of import duties by 2015.  The bill was introduced to the Chilean Congress today, April 30.  Chile currently imposes a 6% import tax, or duty, on goods imported from countries without a joint FTA]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last Thursday, April 26, 2012, Chilean President Sebastian Pinera announced details of his tax overhaul package.  One aspect of note is the elimination of import duties by 2015.  The bill was introduced to the Chilean Congress today, April 30.  Chile currently imposes a 6% import tax, or duty, on goods imported from countries without a joint FTA with Chile.  Chile currently has FTAs with China, Japan, the EU, US, Canada, Mexico and various countries in South America.  Under the duty elimination program, duty would be reduced to 4% in 2013, 2% in 2014 and entirely eliminated in 2015.</p>
<p>Chilean Finance Minister Felipe Larrain stated &#8220;We aspire to turn Chile into a free port like Hong Kong and Singapore and we&#8217;d be the only country in South America without import duties.&#8221;</p>
<p>In addition to eliminating duties, the tax overhaul package would increase the corporate income tax from 18.5% to 20% as well as lower taxes for low and middle income taxpayers, lower tax evasion and raise the tax levied on alcoholic beverages with a higher alcohol content..</p>
<p>In total, the tax overhaul package is expected to increase annual government revenues by $700 million to $1 billion.  The increased revenue will solely be used to fund education initiatives including low interest student loans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ianinternational.com/potential-end-to-chilean-import-duties/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legislative Tracking</title>
		<link>http://www.ianinternational.com/legislative-tracking</link>
		<comments>http://www.ianinternational.com/legislative-tracking#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Howie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News & Regulatory Updates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ianinternational.com/?p=528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Miscellaneous Tariff Bill The deadline for introduction of each and every bill for inclusion in the 2012 MTB is today.   The House Ways and Means Committee has listed a deadline of 3:00 this afternoon for bill submission.  However, bills that are submitted on time but cannot be introduced by 3:00 today should be introduced]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Miscellaneous Tariff Bill</strong></p>
<p>The deadline for introduction of each and every bill for inclusion in the 2012 MTB is today.   The House Ways and Means Committee has listed a deadline of 3:00 this afternoon for bill submission.  However, bills that are submitted on time but cannot be introduced by 3:00 today should be introduced as soon as possible.</p>
<p>So far, there have been hundreds of bills submitted for inclusion in the 2012 MTB. The majority of these bills are in regard to chemicals however numerous other items including electronics, textiles, consumer goods and many other items have been submitted.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>H.R. 4395 &#8211; Cosmetics Safety Amendments Act of 2012</strong></p>
<p>Introduced on 4/18/2012 by Mr. Leonard Lance (R-NJ), the bill was referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.</p>
<p>The purpose of the bill is to &#8220;establish new procedures and requirements for the registration of cosmetic product manufacturing establishments, the submission of cosmetic product and ingredient statements, and the reporting of serious and unexpected cosmetic product adverse events, and for other purposes.&#8221;  Additionally, the bill would deny entry to all products classified as cosmetics that do not present the cosmetic establishment registration number and ingredient statement.  Any deficiency in these numbers would also cause entry to be denied.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>H.R. 4306 - Captive Primate Safety Act </strong></p>
<p>The bill was introduced on 3/29/2012 by Mr. Michael Fitzpatrick (R-PA) and referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources and the House Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife, Oceans and Insular Affairs.</p>
<p>The purpose of the bill is &#8220;To amend the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 to prohibit the importation, exportation, transportation, and sale, receipt, acquisition, or purchase in interstate or foreign commerce, of any live animal of any prohibited wildlife species, and for other purposes.&#8221;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>S. 1324 - Captive Primate Safety Act </strong>(companion to H.R. 4306)</p>
<p>The bill was introduced by Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) and referred to the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>H.R. 4318 &#8211; To Prohibit The Use, Production, Sale, Importation, or Exportation of Any Pesticide Containing Atrazine.</strong></p>
<p>The bill was introduced on 3/29/2012 by Mr. Keith Ellison (D-MN) and referred to the Committees on Agriculture, on Energy and Commerce, on Ways and Means and on Foreign Affairs.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Additional Considerations by the House Committee on Ways and Means</strong></p>
<p>The Chairman of the House Committee on Ways and Means has stated that the Committee plans to consider numerous other trade issues this year.  Included on the agenda and sanctions on Burma as well as legislation in relation to the third-country fabric provision of the African Growth and Opportunity Act, improvements to the DR-CAFTA textile sections, PNTR for Moldova and a customs authorization bill.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ianinternational.com/legislative-tracking/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US &#8211; UK Defense Article Trade Treaty</title>
		<link>http://www.ianinternational.com/us-uk-defense-article-trade-treaty</link>
		<comments>http://www.ianinternational.com/us-uk-defense-article-trade-treaty#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 13:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Howie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News & Regulatory Updates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ianinternational.com/?p=525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On April 13, 2012, the &#8220;U.S. Defense Trade Cooperation Treaty with the United Kingdom&#8221; entered into effect.  The purpose of the treaty is to map out a detailed process for the export and transfer of defense articles without the need for a license from DDTC.  The items that are subject to this exclusion are described]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On April 13, 2012, the &#8220;U.S. Defense Trade Cooperation Treaty with the United Kingdom&#8221; entered into effect.  The purpose of the treaty is to map out a detailed process for the export and transfer of defense articles without the need for a license from DDTC.  The items that are subject to this exclusion are described in ITAR 126.17(g) (22 CRF 126.17(g)).</p>
<p>In addition, the treaty also has updated the format of the Canadian Exemption outlined in ITAR 126.5.</p>
<p>Full text of the treaty may be found in ITAR 126.17 or <a href="http://pmddtc.state.gov/treaties/documents/UK_Treaty.pdf">here</a>.  Please refer to the &#8220;Treaties&#8221; tab on the DDTC website for more information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ianinternational.com/us-uk-defense-article-trade-treaty/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congress Announces Introduction Of Miscellaneous Tariff Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.ianinternational.com/congress-announces-introduction-of-bills-for-miscellaneous-tariff-bill</link>
		<comments>http://www.ianinternational.com/congress-announces-introduction-of-bills-for-miscellaneous-tariff-bill#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 01:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Howie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News & Regulatory Updates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://033ddb9.netsolhost.com/wordpress/?p=347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On March 30, 2012, the House Ways and Means Committee announces the commencement of a new miscellaneous tariff bill. Members of the committee must submit goods for inclusion in the bill by April 30, 2012. Please see our e-book regarding the Miscellaneous Tariff Bill for guidance on this matter. Guide to the Miscellaneous Tariff Bill]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On March 30, 2012, the House Ways and Means Committee announces the commencement of a new miscellaneous tariff bill. Members of the committee must submit goods for inclusion in the bill by April 30, 2012. Please see our e-book regarding the Miscellaneous Tariff Bill for guidance on this matter.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline; color: #0000ff;"><a href="http://www.ianinternational.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Miscellaneous-Tariff-Bill.pdf"><span style="color: #0000ff; text-decoration: underline;">Guide to the Miscellaneous Tariff Bill</span></a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ianinternational.com/congress-announces-introduction-of-bills-for-miscellaneous-tariff-bill/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CBP Sheds Light on Documentation Requirements For Tariff Preference Claims</title>
		<link>http://www.ianinternational.com/cbp-sheds-light-on-documentation-requirements-for-tariff-preference-claims</link>
		<comments>http://www.ianinternational.com/cbp-sheds-light-on-documentation-requirements-for-tariff-preference-claims#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 22:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Howie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News & Regulatory Updates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://033ddb9.netsolhost.com/wordpress/?p=328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On March 22, 2012, CBP issued a Ruling to help clarify the documentation requirements necessary to substantiate tariff preference claims. CBP had previously issued several other ruling relating to this matter including one in March 2006 in regard to the DR-CAFTA and two more in October 2007 and March 2011 in regard to textiles and]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On March 22, 2012, CBP issued a Ruling to help clarify the documentation requirements necessary to substantiate tariff preference claims. CBP had previously issued several other ruling relating to this matter including one in March 2006 in regard to the DR-CAFTA and two more in October 2007 and March 2011 in regard to textiles and apparel. CBP has relied on these previous ruling in publishing their most recent ruling on this matter. Links to all ruling referenced in this post can be found at the bottom of this post.</p>
<p>CBP has made the following rulings:</p>
<p>A claim should not be denied due to the importer&#8217;s failure to provide specific documentation if the port does not request such documentation;</p>
<p>An affidavit of origin is not necessarily an absolute requirement since other documents are acceptable as long as they contain all the necessary information;</p>
<p>The blanket certification of &#8220;sold or to be sold&#8221; is acceptable, however ports do reserve the right to request proof that sales actually occur;</p>
<p>The use of certain phrases in regard to a type of yarn since this may depend upon the condition of the yard due to th stage of production;</p>
<p>Different tariff classifications may be appropriate depending upon the condition of yard due to its stage of production;</p>
<p>As long as the body of an affidavit is clear, a port may not reject the affidavit for the use of certain phrases in its title;</p>
<p>An affidavit that is signed by someone other than the named person is acceptable as long as the signature is on behalf of the named person and the signature is initialed to specify that it is not that of the named person;</p>
<p>A copy of a notarized affidavit may not be rejected since a copy is sufficient even though the notary stamp indicates that a copy will render the affidavit void;</p>
<p>A classification error at the 10-digit level is not sufficient to reject a claim as it is immaterial in the determination of eligibility;</p>
<p>Typographical do not defeat a claim so long as they are consistent with the rest of the document;</p>
<p>A purchase order with consistent product number and style but lacking fiber content is not a basis for rejection of a claim;</p>
<p>Documents supporting consignment of materials to a third party that is not named in the import are still acceptable so long as the roles of the aprties are explained with sufficient detail to allow the material to be traceable;</p>
<p>Except for a NAFTA certificate, an origin certificate need not be in a specific format, or be on company letterhead as long as all necessary information is present;</p>
<p>When multiple materials are covered by a single document, importers should be sure to identify the relevant materials;</p>
<p>The relationship of all identified parties and documents should be explained for review purposes;</p>
<p>Before denying a claim, CBP should seek either clarification and/or further information if omissions due to oversight or inaccurate language translation(s) are present;</p>
<p>An importer should supply CBP with supporting documentation such as purchase orders, invoices and proof of payment in an affidavit fails to provide the details necessary to confirm the validity of a claim;</p>
<p>Affidavits should be signed, but if they are not, the CBP import specialist should call the official that is noed on the document for verification of the document&#8217;s authenticity.</p>
<p>Links to source documents can be found here:</p>
<ul>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="color: #0000ff; text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.cbp.gov/linkhandler/cgov/trade/priority_trade/textiles/tbts/tbt2006/tbt_06_005.ctt/tbt_06_005.doc"><span style="color: #0000ff; text-decoration: underline;">March 2006</span></a></span></span></li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="color: #0000ff; text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.cbp.gov/linkhandler/cgov/trade/priority_trade/textiles/tbts/tbt2006/tbt_06_005.ctt/tbt_06_005.doc"><span style="color: #0000ff; text-decoration: underline;">October 2007</span></a></span></span></li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="color: #0000ff; text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.cbp.gov/linkhandler/cgov/trade/priority_trade/textiles/tbts/tbt2011/tbt_11_004.ctt/tbt_11_004.pdf"><span style="color: #0000ff; text-decoration: underline;">March 2011</span></a></span></span></li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="color: #0000ff; text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/trade/priority_trade/textiles/tbts/supp_docs_app.xml"><span style="color: #0000ff; text-decoration: underline;">March 2012</span></a></span></span></li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ianinternational.com/cbp-sheds-light-on-documentation-requirements-for-tariff-preference-claims/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

